Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. sponsors. rss.
 From: Toms
  Where is Toms?
 
 Hong Kong
 Toms
 To: CraigP
  Where is CraigP?
 Las Vegas
 Nevada - United States
 CraigP
 Tags
Subject: RE: Is Fospro is a dead language.
Thread ID: 28018 Message ID: 28819 # Views: 87 # Ratings: 0
Version: Unknown Category: Off-topic
Date: Monday, September 08, 2003 3:04:22 AM         
   


Agree.
There are too much VB jobs, but too too less VFP jobs in HONG KONG too.

Toms

> >
> > FOXPRO IS NOT DEAD!
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > Those lamers just want to defend themselves to what they know and protect what they don't
> > know about. VB... ;-) well thats a very good language, yet FOXPRO is better in some areas
> > specially DATA. I agree with that!
> >
> > The battle here is this (fer example) ...
> >
> > 1. can foxpro do the (RI) Referential Integrity thing??? ;-)
> > well if you say ull be using a .DBF that may not work. and if you want to make
> > solutions then you have to CODE (that sux).
> >
> > Now, SQL Server comes in with Referential Integrity, database triggers etc.
> >
> > Most lamers think of this -> if you are using FOXPRO you are using DBF... ;-)
> >
> > nah... think again
> >
> > 2. can foxpro do the "SECURITY" thing???
> > if you have a .DBF that may not work... and if you wanna make that possible
> > you have to code! n what... ENCRYPTION or maybe DBFLOCK... (not in multiusermode)
> >
> > Now, SQL Server comes in again... for better / stronger SECURITY
> >
> > 3. how about DATABASE INTEGRITY AND CONSISTENCY???
> >
> > Hey! this argument is endless. Those lamers doesn't know the difference of what a
> > database, a table, a DBMS, or a RDBMS, client-server, multi-tier, multi-thread, sockets,
> > dataports, DDE, data sharing, perhaps an IOCTL or much more the language itself.
> >
> > using a SEEK / LOCATE / FINDFIRST / FINDPREV / APPEND / INSERT INTO / UPDATE /
> > DELETE (or whatever the hell it is) doesnt prove that a software or language is inefficient.
> >
> > 4. try this at home kids. this is simply ASSEMBLY... ;-)
> >
> > a. run MSDOS prompt
> > b. type -> C:\<br />> > c. type -> COPY CON RESET.COM
> > d. type the number HOLDING the alt-keys -> ALT+205 ALT+25
> > e. then press -> CTRL+Z
> >
> > voila you have a RESET.COM -> (now this code rulez!!!) it is simly a RESET program
> > for DOS. type RESET.COM and your DOSBOX flies away... now thats kewl ;-)
> >
> > in ASSEMBLY,
> >
> > a. run MSDOS prompt
> > b. type -> DEBUG.COM {press enter}
> > c. type -> n RESET.COM {press enter}
> > d. type -> a 100 {press enter}
> > e. type -> INT 19 {press enter}
> > f. type -> RCX {press enter}
> > g. type -> 02 {press enter}
> > h. type -> w {press enter}
> >
> > and voila, its just the same... INT 19 means System Reset in ASM
> >
> > well. my point here is that I was able to make a reset program WITHOUT ANY DAMN LANGUAGE.
> > just COPY CON!
> >
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > WELL, THE POWER OF A LANGUAGE IS USELESS IF IT IS NOT HARNESSED BY THE
> > ONE USING IT. ;-)
> >
> > -Mz DarkReligion----
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ya know Guys I love FoxPro… I have used it in every job I have ever had for the last 11 Years.
>
> Now the time has come when I can no longer find work as a Foxpro programmer in my home state… In talking with headhunters it turns out that there are close to 50 to 100 Foxpro work hungry programmers to every 1 job!
>
> I wish I could say the “FoxPro” was the language of choice… But its just not…
>
> The worst thing is that now most Foxpro jobs are along the lines of… “Support this old Foxpro App… while we put in its replacement! (AkA my last job).
>
> I want Foxpro to be the “King of the Hill” But do the math your self!
>
> On Monster.com as of September 6, 2003 there are 119 total Foxpro jobs as to 2621 VB jobs… And I hate to say this a lot of the 119 Foxpro jobs are not “True” Foxpro Jobs…
>
> I am looking now to get out of programming all together…
>
> CraigP




COMPLETE THREAD
Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Samir Ibrahim @ 8/23/2003 1:54:23 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Eric den Doop @ 8/23/2003 2:07:16 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Rick Pierson @ 8/23/2003 8:19:13 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 8/24/2003 4:01:27 AM
RE: Is FoxPro is a dead language. Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 8/24/2003 8:35:57 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 8/24/2003 6:31:56 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Grigore Dolghin @ 8/25/2003 1:15:47 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 8/25/2003 11:03:40 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 8/26/2003 5:49:21 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Samir Ibrahim @ 8/26/2003 6:03:01 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 8/26/2003 7:15:07 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Toms @ 8/27/2003 3:19:41 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by mike castillo @ 8/27/2003 6:28:32 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Mz DarkReligion @ 8/28/2003 7:37:12 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by CraigP @ 9/7/2003 1:22:20 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Toms @ 9/8/2003 3:04:22 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 9/8/2003 6:46:11 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Mz DarkReligion @ 9/9/2003 5:00:25 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 9/9/2003 1:01:36 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Mz DarkReligion @ 9/10/2003 3:11:33 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 9/10/2003 8:18:51 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Mz DarkReligion @ 9/11/2003 11:11:07 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Eric den Doop @ 9/11/2003 2:05:49 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Helen @ 9/11/2003 7:59:12 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 9/12/2003 7:46:42 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 9/11/2003 3:01:13 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Mz DarkReligion @ 9/12/2003 11:57:21 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 9/12/2003 12:01:10 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Eric den Doop @ 9/12/2003 2:09:57 PM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Foxhound @ 9/13/2003 5:45:48 AM
RE: Is Fospro is a dead language. Posted by Eric den Doop @ 9/13/2003 12:53:45 PM
Thanx! Posted by Mz DarkReligion @ 9/15/2003 7:19:56 AM
RE: Thanx! Posted by Amar, Joemarie B. @ 9/16/2003 6:51:50 AM
RE: Thanx! Posted by Mz @ 9/16/2003 12:05:59 PM