Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. sponsors. rss.
 From: Eric den Doop
  Where is Eric den Doop?
 Houten
 Netherlands
 Eric den Doop
 To: Boudewijn Lutgerink
  Where is Boudewijn Lutgerink?
 Paalbalk Huissen
 Netherlands
 Boudewijn Lutgerink
 Tags
Subject: RE: NO VFP10!!!
Thread ID: 125558 Message ID: 125745 # Views: 204 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: General VFP Topics
Date: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:23:57 AM         
   


> Once more, if you feel offended, my apologies, that was not my intention.
>
> > If you don't understand the true meaning of the MVP program, I sincerely hope you will never be part of it.
> >
> Thank you so much for these encouraging words.
> The true meaning you say. truth according to whome? MY truth is that any MVP should (among other things) "take his shirt off and fight for the existence of the product they stand for."

Listen mister, your truth about the MVP program isn't relevant. And I am glad it isn't. Remember, this is Microsoft's program, not yours. You do not have the right to judge or to change the meaning of the program.

Here are the lines from the MVP home page that I believe have already posted before:

Microsoft Most Valuable Professionals (MVPs) are exceptional technical community leaders from around the world who are awarded for voluntarily sharing their high quality, real world expertise in offline and online technical communities. Microsoft MVPs are a highly select group of experts that represents the technical community's best and brightest, and they share a deep commitment to community and a willingness to help others.

https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx

Your remarks about my dedication are way out of line and totally irrelevant to this discussion.

Anyway, apologies accepted. But for the future, I advise you to think twice before posting nonsense like that.
--
Eric den Doop
www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts



COMPLETE THREAD
NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM