Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. sponsors. rss.
 From: Boudewijn Lutgerink
  Where is Boudewijn Lutgerink?
 Paalbalk Huissen
 Netherlands
 Boudewijn Lutgerink
 To: Eric den Doop
  Where is Eric den Doop?
 Houten
 Netherlands
 Eric den Doop
 Tags
Subject: RE: NO VFP10!!!
Thread ID: 125558 Message ID: 125754 # Views: 200 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: General VFP Topics
Date: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:06:45 AM         
   


>...
>
> Here are the lines from the MVP home page that I believe have already posted before:
>
> Microsoft Most Valuable Professionals (MVPs) are exceptional technical community leaders from around the world who are awarded for voluntarily sharing their high quality, real world expertise in offline and online technical communities. Microsoft MVPs are a highly select group of experts that represents the technical community's best and brightest, and they share a deep commitment to community and a willingness to help others.

> https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>
>...

> --
> Eric den Doop
> www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts

Maybe so, but then why is it that MVP's are always related to a certain technology and not as-is?
How come that, looking at the MVP awardees list I see all awarded persons listed under a certain technology? Doesn't that tie the award to a technology? Maybe I still understand wrong and maybe the information, given in, let's say, a VISIO related community is of the same value for a person who seeks C# information. In al honesty I ask, am I missing something here?

To be perfectly clear, I do NOT doubt that you are dedicated to VFP. Otherwise this very site (to name just one example) would simply not exist. Just to refresh your memory, I am just as dedicated both towards the site as well as VFP.
Remember the time the site was moving from Texas to the Netherlands?
I do recall that the server has been runing a while from my home till late 2002, on a server I bought. My sole motivation was because at that time you were about to give up on foxite, a site that was valuable for many persons at that time already.



Boudewijn Lutge®ink
http://www.vfpdevelopers-online.com
There's a light at the end of the tunnel, let's just hope it is not the headlight of a freight-train. And indeed it is not, it is the headlight of the traction-engine of MS Marketing dept.



COMPLETE THREAD
NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM