RE: NO VFP10!!! (Posted by Eric den Doop) - www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts

> >...
> >
> > Here are the lines from the MVP home page that I believe have already posted before:
> >
> > Microsoft Most Valuable Professionals (MVPs) are exceptional technical community leaders from around the world who are awarded for voluntarily sharing their high quality, real world expertise in offline and online technical communities. Microsoft MVPs are a highly select group of experts that represents the technical community's best and brightest, and they share a deep commitment to community and a willingness to help others.
> > https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
> >
> >...
>
> > --
> > Eric den Doop
> > www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts
>
> Maybe so, but then why is it that MVP's are always related to a certain technology and not as-is?
> How come that, looking at the MVP awardees list I see all awarded persons listed under a certain technology? Doesn't that tie the award to a technology? Maybe I still understand wrong and maybe the information, given in, let's say, a VISIO related community is of the same value for a person who seeks C# information. In al honesty I ask, am I missing something here?

What's your point? What you are missing here is the true definition of the MVP Award. Yes, it is tied to a certain technology, but the 'rules' do not say anything about an MVP being required to "take his shirt off and fight for the existence of the product they stand for.".

>
> To be perfectly clear, I do NOT doubt that you are dedicated to VFP. Otherwise this very site (to name just one example) would simply not exist. Just to refresh your memory, I am just as dedicated both towards the site as well as VFP.

You don't have to refresh my memory. I have never stated that you are not dedicated. You, on the other hand, questioned my dedication only a few posts ago (http://www.foxite.com/archives/0000125693.htm)

> Remember the time the site was moving from Texas to the Netherlands?
> I do recall that the server has been runing a while from my home till late 2002, on a server I bought. My sole motivation was because at that time you were about to give up on foxite, a site that was valuable for many persons at that time already.
>

I don't see how this relates to the discussion about my not needing VFP10?
--
Eric den Doop
www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts

COMPLETE THREAD

NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM