Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. sponsors. rss.
 From: Jamie Osborn
  Where is Jamie Osborn?
 Melbourne
 Australia
 Jamie Osborn
 To: Nick Bean
  Where is Nick Bean?
 Melbourne
 Australia
 Nick Bean
 Tags
Subject: RE: NO VFP10!!!
Thread ID: 125558 Message ID: 125875 # Views: 212 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: General VFP Topics
Date: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:12:13 AM         
   


> > > I am sure that other companies will fill the gap opened by MS, but still I feel sad. Not because that step will
> > > reflect somehow on me (I'll have works to do until 2300 :o))) but because such handy tool will be thrown away.
> >
> > I know what you are saying but I don't really see VFP as being "thrown away".
> >
> > If MS said, "Right, we aren't selling any more licenses for VFP and not one more minute of time is being spent on the product. It's not going to run on Vista so bad luck." - that would be getting closer to "throwing it away".
> >
> > We have a mature product with a data engine that rocks and a community that can extend the product as needed for the foreseeable future.
> >
> > I won't be cutting up my VFP cd any time soon!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > amie
>
> G'day Jamie,
> Of course, the management folk here at the Bank are running around with ideas of "the end of the world...". But that's what you get working in a large organisation ;)
>
> Like you, I won't be cutting up my VFP CD. It's still a relevant product in this web crazed world. For small to medium companies, its a cheap and easy product to use.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick

Don't tell me that Goran told them already :)

And I can't believe that they are worried - this is the organisation that had a big bunch of VB3 developers working on Windows For WorkGroups in 2002!

Cheers,
Jamie



COMPLETE THREAD
NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM