home
signup
forum
archives
search
google
articles
downloads
faq
members
weblogs
sponsors
rss
RE: NO VFP10!!!
From: Ken Murphy
Springhill
Canada
Ken Murphy
To: Ronan Masangcay
Manila
Philippines
Ronan Masangcay
Tags
NO VFP10!!!
Ken Murphy
VFP10
Subject:
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Thread ID:
125558
Message ID:
128364
# Views:
75
# Ratings:
0
Version:
Not Applicable
Category:
General VFP Topics
Date:
Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:14:43 PM
This message was rated by:
Footer
> > > > MS announce that there will be no VFP 10, and this time this is official :-(
> > > >
> > > >
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vfoxpro/bb308952.aspx
> > > >
> > > > -----------------
> > > > Borislav Borissov
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK, I will weigh in on this as well.
> > >
> > > I am not exactly sure what this means. I think it means that there will not be a VFP 10, but that there will be a SEDNA and an SP2. Beyond that, there is this "open source" thing, but I am unsure what that will yield. Will an open source VFP take on a life of it's own? It can, but we would have to get involved in that open source process. Certainly, I believe that the talent in this community could take VFP forward.
> > >
> > > What will this mean to me? The big worry is licensing. If VFP goes open source, how will the licensing be handled? Open source does not mean the same thing as "free and without licenses."
> > >
> > > Do I need a VFP 10? Not really. As Eric says, I am pretty happy with VFP 9. I would like to see a native OOP menu option (as opposed to the existing procedural .MPR concept.) Do I need this to happen in a new release of VFP? No, not really. I would certainly be willing to accept this in a service pack (but I am not holding my breath.) Could this be built as an open source add on? Probably.
> > >
> > > The real kicker here is that VFP is an absolutely fantastic option for middleware. Use a SQL backend with what ever you want for a UI but put VFP firmly in the middle. For desktop LAN apps, VFP is my choice. If MS does not see a future in desktop apps, so be it. I still want VFP as middleware in any datacentric app that I build. I don't really think that I will want to change this either.
> > >
> > > Again, I am not really very sure what this means, but hopefully more info will be forthcoming - especially on the licensing issue.
> > >
> > > Ken
> > > You shall know the truth - and the truth shall set you free. (John 8:33)
> >
> > VFP ISN'T going open source. YAG has stated that explicitly.
> >
> > Keep using VFP just as you have been doing!
> >
> > Unless the technology in databases changes radically in the next 5 years, whereby every current technology is obsolete (and that ain't gonna happen), VFP will still be the perfect choice for your middleware solutions.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jamie
>
> All,
>
> Can we still use MS XP Pro and VFP 9 in 64bit machines? Is there a known issue of vfp9 and 64bit pcs
>
> Thanks
> Ronan
>
>
> Iron Sharpens Iron
Nope - as far as I know, VFP runs just fine on a 64bit machine.
Ken
You shall know the truth - and the truth shall set you free. (John 8:33)
COMPLETE THREAD
NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!!
Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM