RE: NO VFP10!!! (Posted by Ken Murphy) - www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts

> > > Can we still use MS XP Pro and VFP 9 in 64bit machines? Is there a known issue of vfp9 and 64bit pcs
> > >
>
> > Nope - as far as I know, VFP runs just fine on a 64bit machine.
> >
> > Ken
> > You shall know the truth - and the truth shall set you free. (John 8:33)
>
> Thanks Ken.
>
> I guess the issue is "what happens after Vista". Given that it will last for 4 years and not be called anything else e.g. Visto, Vister, before 2015, I guess I wont be making any drastic shift to dot net (although eventually I will, but not basic).
>
> My hopes will be pinned on Vista and the VFP9 SP that will be released for it.
>
> Honestly, I dont know why MS opted to market gwbasic (VB.NET) over the fox. in fact i agree with you in your other post, VFP can be used to market SQL Server, not compete with it.
>
> What crucial advantages does Basica / VB.NET have over the fox anyhow? I smell that this "wind of change" passed throu s sewer or something.
>
> Thanks again Ken.
>
> Just sad -- Ronan
>
> Iron Sharpens Iron

Ronan,

Don't bury the old Fox just yet. I hear rumblings in the blog net about Microsoft possibly opening up VFP as open source. Keep your ears open.

Ken
You shall know the truth - and the truth shall set you free. (John 8:33)

COMPLETE THREAD

NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM

RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM