Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. sponsors. rss.
 From: Peter De Valença
  Where is Peter De Valença?
 Haarlem
 Netherlands
 Peter De Valença
 To: Eric den Doop
  Where is Eric den Doop?
 Houten
 Netherlands
 Eric den Doop
 Tags
Subject: RE: NO VFP10!!!
Thread ID: 125558 Message ID: 128550 # Views: 73 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: General VFP Topics
Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:23:29 PM         
   


> > > I was indeed. The moment I read the news I started these calls, not knowing the MVP summit was going on at that time... BTW nor did the receptionists at MS know that.
> >
> > This is the UT-message he was complaining: Re: Serious consequences, but for who? Thread #1204965 Message #1205915
> >
>
> Peter, please repost the entire message. Many members here do not have a UT account. So for many visitors, including me, your posting is rather useless. Thanks.
>
> Hope all is well.
> --
> Eric den Doop
> www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts

Here is YAG's reply to Joel Leach (20/03/2007 03:43:14):

Why now? When would be a good time? After VFP8 shipped? VFP9? VFP125?

There would be no good time for this. But once Sedna started hitting completion (next release is beta 1), planning began for the next release (as I've been saying it would). At that time the decision got made and we pushed to be open about it as soon as possible.

Those folks at the Visual FoxPro User Group in Atlanta that I spoke at in February (or was it January?) will recall that I said that we'd start looking at pricing, release, etc., in March. That's what happened.

And Joel - not to rant on you, but I'm seriously considering taking a break from all things Visual FoxPro. My blood pressure is up this past week. One person called me 6 times in 30 minutes at work, leaving messages that I'm a coward for not responding immediately. People have been pretty nasty on my blog comments. I signed up for this because I thought it was a better way to do it - but I'm not sure I'm able to keep things going.

yag




COMPLETE THREAD
NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:51:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 11:14:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 11:29:22 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 12:42:31 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/14/2007 10:05:23 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Andy Kramek @ 3/14/2007 10:19:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tracy Holzer @ 3/20/2007 8:56:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 8:24:48 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 2:05:06 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:04:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:48:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Patrick McGreevy @ 4/3/2007 5:20:46 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/14/2007 12:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:03:00 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:34:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/16/2007 6:49:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 9:12:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:29:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/19/2007 12:36:55 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 7:47:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vincent Byrne @ 3/14/2007 8:49:13 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 8:58:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:19:28 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 8:53:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/14/2007 9:23:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Naomi Nosonovsky @ 3/15/2007 5:37:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Nick Bean @ 3/18/2007 9:34:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/20/2007 8:58:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/20/2007 10:48:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:14:02 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/14/2007 10:24:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:01:40 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:11:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/14/2007 11:15:50 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:02:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 12:15:39 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:59:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 7:23:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 9:06:45 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 3/15/2007 9:22:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 10:13:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 11:13:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 12:13:01 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/16/2007 4:51:28 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Judy Lester @ 3/15/2007 2:13:16 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Sheila Mae Sentin @ 4/16/2007 3:22:48 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Barbara Peisch @ 3/15/2007 5:04:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 1:50:03 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 2:01:06 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Vladimir Zhuravlev @ 4/11/2007 2:52:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/11/2007 4:32:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Soykan OZCELIK @ 3/14/2007 10:20:38 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Hawkins @ 3/22/2007 11:10:51 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/24/2007 5:32:42 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:12:12 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/14/2007 11:08:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Tamar Granor @ 3/15/2007 12:38:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:08:27 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:14:55 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:26:47 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 1:39:18 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 3/15/2007 1:56:49 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 1:01:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bruce Tan @ 3/31/2007 8:12:31 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 4:27:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:39:50 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Johan Ballet @ 3/19/2007 2:15:30 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by William Sanders @ 3/20/2007 12:12:34 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Rob Brioul @ 3/21/2007 11:59:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Booth @ 3/22/2007 10:21:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/9/2007 4:25:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 4/10/2007 4:33:49 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/10/2007 4:56:25 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 5:32:19 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Peter De Valença @ 4/11/2007 5:23:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/11/2007 5:35:24 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/14/2007 11:59:18 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 3/15/2007 12:44:10 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:37:53 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 12:14:43 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 12:35:32 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 1:18:53 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 1:43:26 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 2:39:34 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Eric den Doop @ 4/10/2007 2:45:17 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 4/10/2007 3:00:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/11/2007 2:59:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 4/13/2007 6:43:59 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jamie Osborn @ 4/14/2007 10:22:35 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/1/2007 9:59:58 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Bernard Bout @ 5/2/2007 4:09:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 5/2/2007 10:50:04 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/15/2007 10:39:14 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by tushar @ 3/15/2007 11:19:32 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Chris-Jan Manuel @ 3/17/2007 1:49:29 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Steve Bloodsworth @ 3/15/2007 5:51:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by kulwant singh @ 3/17/2007 5:59:00 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Binod Binani @ 3/18/2007 6:36:36 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by edwin @ 3/19/2007 12:56:07 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Willem van Oosten @ 3/19/2007 12:46:08 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ralph Dreifus @ 3/21/2007 12:34:41 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/21/2007 1:57:13 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/23/2007 10:00:57 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/23/2007 11:30:11 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by ed hardy @ 3/25/2007 7:07:33 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ken Murphy @ 3/25/2007 7:23:39 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:01:21 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Borislav Borissov @ 3/26/2007 12:09:21 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Christian Tabligan @ 3/27/2007 4:48:26 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Ronan Masangcay @ 4/10/2007 11:40:37 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/24/2007 9:15:24 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Hans de Groot @ 3/25/2007 10:16:08 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by CF @ 3/26/2007 8:57:14 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jerzy Kopinski @ 3/27/2007 11:06:44 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Glenn Cleveland @ 4/5/2007 1:44:23 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Jim Denney @ 4/10/2007 6:12:44 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Anders Wennerwik @ 4/30/2007 6:04:07 PM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by John Discallar @ 6/11/2007 9:04:36 AM
RE: NO VFP10!!! Posted by Camil Ghircoias @ 6/11/2007 7:02:21 PM