Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. sponsors. rss.
 From: Stary
  Where is Stary?
 Ljubljana
 Slovenia
 Stary
 To: Mike Yearwood
  Where is Mike Yearwood?
 Toronto
 Canada
 Mike Yearwood
 Tags
Subject: RE: Slow access to DBF on network
Thread ID: 203810 Message ID: 204014 # Views: 33 # Ratings: 0
Version: Visual FoxPro 9 Category: Databases, Tables and SQL Server
Date: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:05:38 PM         
   


> > I tried to do that (with 0 and 1), but no difference in performances.
> > Actually, it is even worse with setting to 0.
>
> That is not a logical statement. "Even worse" is not "no difference".

Correct. :)
I wanted to write no difference in better performances.



> I'm sorry to tell you, but you will have to accept the slower performance as the standard. You must set it to 0, which will make the behavior consistent for *ALL* users. That is the important thing. There is no way to make it that fast for all users. It will also reduce corruption. Rushmore and indexes will make the building of the cursor faster as the number of records will be small - as they should be.

I see. Not what I wanted to hear, but I believe you are right.

Thank's.



COMPLETE THREAD
Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Stary @ 11/16/2008 5:17:31 AM
RE: Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Tom Saddul @ 11/16/2008 2:07:09 PM
RE: Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Stary @ 11/16/2008 9:03:19 PM
RE: Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 11/16/2008 2:32:26 PM
RE: Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Stary @ 11/16/2008 8:35:24 PM
RE: Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 11/17/2008 3:20:12 PM
RE: Slow access to DBF on network Posted by Stary @ 11/17/2008 9:05:38 PM