> Yes, you can build views against free tables. It's only the view itself that must be in a DBC, and you can build that on-the-fly.
Oh, I didn't know that! I use views on SQL server only. I don't really know the reason, but I always preferred to use free tables against putting them to the DBC. So I automatically eliminated views since I thought they need a dbc.
I don't have a lot of experience with views. Do you think they have any advantages than using the CursorAdapter class?