RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? (Posted by Eric den Doop) - www.foxite.com

Hi Andy,

> All of my testing has shown that ODBC is up to 0 times faster than OLDEB in VFP.

0 times? I'm sure this is a typo :). Could you let us know the right number?
--
Eric den Doop
www.foxite.com - The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts

COMPLETE THREAD

Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Dexter Carlit @ 10/19/2006 10:00:17 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Pete Sass @ 10/20/2006 2:44:12 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Dexter Carlit @ 10/20/2006 5:22:23 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Pete Sass @ 10/20/2006 7:30:36 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/20/2006 7:37:19 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Bernard Bout @ 10/23/2006 10:38:51 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ryan Lashway @ 12/4/2006 9:02:45 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/23/2006 1:57:47 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Eric den Doop @ 10/23/2006 2:43:15 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/24/2006 12:17:38 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Nilson Rishi @ 10/23/2006 3:32:12 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/23/2006 6:37:52 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Nilson Rishi @ 10/24/2006 5:17:33 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Bernard Bout @ 10/24/2006 6:18:13 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Nilson Rishi @ 10/24/2006 8:31:50 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by tushar @ 10/24/2006 7:22:47 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Nilson Rishi @ 10/24/2006 10:00:29 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/24/2006 1:32:41 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by tushar @ 10/25/2006 9:14:35 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/25/2006 1:10:22 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/24/2006 12:26:39 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Nilson Rishi @ 10/24/2006 1:03:04 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/24/2006 1:21:46 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Pete Sass @ 10/24/2006 10:23:04 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/25/2006 1:05:40 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Nilson Rishi @ 10/25/2006 4:31:57 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by tushar @ 10/25/2006 9:28:28 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 10/25/2006 3:04:41 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Pete Sass @ 10/25/2006 4:10:42 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/25/2006 4:47:32 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Bernard Bout @ 10/25/2006 6:13:41 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/25/2006 6:40:19 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Bernard Bout @ 10/26/2006 5:55:08 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/26/2006 2:33:34 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Bernard Bout @ 10/26/2006 11:33:28 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Randy Smith @ 11/28/2006 8:59:48 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 11/29/2006 1:15:09 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Randy Smith @ 11/29/2006 2:58:16 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 11/29/2006 7:27:04 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Randy Smith @ 11/30/2006 11:14:13 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 12/1/2006 1:00:35 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Randy Smith @ 12/1/2006 4:03:51 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Andy Kramek @ 12/1/2006 5:21:24 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Randy Smith @ 12/5/2006 1:25:04 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 10/27/2006 11:33:27 AM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 10/27/2006 2:27:33 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Boudewijn Lutgerink @ 12/5/2006 12:55:03 PM

RE: Why ODBC and Not OLEDB? Posted by Ken Murphy @ 12/5/2006 3:12:45 PM