Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. file info. rss.
 From: Mike Yearwood
  Where is Mike Yearwood?
 Toronto
 Canada
 Mike Yearwood
 To: Bernard Bout
  Where is Bernard Bout?
 Brisbane
 Australia
 Bernard Bout
 Tags
Subject: RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3
Thread ID: 208997 Message ID: 209843 # Views: 3 # Ratings: 0
Version: Visual FoxPro 9 SP2 Category: Databases, Tables and SQL Server
Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:11:38 PM         
   


> >
> > Uh, actually? I've flown many flight simulators since 1979. As a result, I was able to fly a real Cessna including side-slipping, like I'd done it for years. All of that does help me fly a simulated 747. Having learned to fly a 747 would help fly a Cessna, I'm pretty sure.
> >
> >
> > That's poor OOP - or what I refer to as POOP ;) By changing the selectcmd and then executing the cursorfill, another object could have changed the selectcmd before the first cursorfill resulting in too much weirdness.
> >
> > Yes, but my point is you and I should not have had to do that. It should be that way from the source.
> >
> > Mike Yearwood
> > Microsoft MVP Visual FoxPro 2008
> >
> >
> >
> > We have enough youth. We need a fountain of smart!
> > There may be many ways to skin a cat, but there are very few right ways to do it.
>
> Why? The developers could not keep adding thousands of properties to suit different frameworks. I use it this way so I added a property. Someone else may use it another way and will not need that property. Besides there are heaps of hooks provided into the events that I never found it a problem.

It certainly could have been provided with a single mechanism for handling the where clause.

Look at problem # 1 here: http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~CursorAdapterOrNot~VFP

>
> If you develop a framework that requires such properties just add it. I would rather a property I controlled than one that was added - (sorta like hardcoded) into the class.

Are you sure about that? How about backstyle_access on containers? We didn't add that. Microsoft did. We just use it. Without it, we'd all have different approaches - which based on your recent discusssions with some people about dodefault, should show you the harm in having no standards.

>
> Bernard
>
> ** If you see someone without a smile, give em one of yours :) **
> My Blog 8-)



Mike Yearwood
Microsoft MVP Visual FoxPro 2008



We have enough youth. We need a fountain of smart!
There may be many ways to skin a cat, but there are very few right ways to do it.

ENTIRE THREAD

Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Samir Ibrahim @ 12/23/2008 1:18:40 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by mike castillo @ 12/23/2008 2:14:59 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Samir Ibrahim @ 12/23/2008 3:47:39 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/24/2008 2:23:22 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/24/2008 7:44:25 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/25/2008 1:09:05 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/25/2008 6:57:17 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/27/2008 6:57:21 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by vivek deodhar @ 12/27/2008 5:58:12 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/27/2008 7:04:00 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 12/27/2008 4:06:01 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by vivek deodhar @ 12/29/2008 5:42:39 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 12/27/2008 4:07:55 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/28/2008 2:04:35 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/29/2008 3:41:41 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/29/2008 9:35:38 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/29/2008 6:02:04 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 12/29/2008 8:45:10 PM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/30/2008 2:50:22 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/30/2008 2:56:26 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 12/30/2008 4:01:38 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Bernard Bout @ 12/31/2008 5:39:06 AM
RE: Bernard CA New Tutorial Part 3 Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 12/31/2008 4:11:38 PM