Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. file info. rss.
 From: Dan Baker
  Where is Dan Baker?
 Effort of the Poconos
 Pennsylvania - United States
 Dan Baker
 To: Michel Levy
  Where is Michel Levy?
 
 France
 Michel Levy
 Tags
Subject: RE: .net development
Thread ID: 393675 Message ID: 393922 # Views: 55 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: Databases, Tables and SQL Server
Date: Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:35:08 AM         
   


Hey Michel, good to hear from you. Happy holidays.

I took a look at the StrataFrame documentation and it's extremely easy to read and
seems very solid.

If someone follows your path, a couple questions:

1. Do you recommend getting comfortable with .Net first or learning Strataframe
and .Net togehte?

2. Does it matter which year's Visual Studio version you buy to get started?

Thanks,

Dan B.


> Hi,
>
> My way was VB.net and StrataFrame, with SQL Server.
>
> All business code is either in SQL Server, either in StrataFrame business objects ; I can reuse it in all apps, desktop or web, no matter.
>
> Among all the 3rd-party data binding addons, I found Strata was the most simple to use, coming from the VFP world (and BTW it was the fastest, and the cleanest for a SQL developper)
>
>
> Michel L

ENTIRE THREAD

.net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/21/2013 10:36:52 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Paul Hemans @ 12/21/2013 9:06:52 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/23/2013 9:35:34 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Stefan Wuebbe @ 12/23/2013 10:26:41 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:50:04 AM
RE: .net development Posted by naveed ahmad @ 12/23/2013 2:27:02 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:47:55 AM
RE: .net development Posted by naveed ahmad @ 12/24/2013 7:13:04 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Victor Espina @ 12/23/2013 2:40:26 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:49:06 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Tore Bleken @ 12/23/2013 2:52:38 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:51:10 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/23/2013 5:26:02 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:55:51 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 12:16:20 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 1:15:48 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/24/2013 1:41:31 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 3:02:13 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 2:28:30 AM
RE: .net development Posted by David Mustakim @ 12/24/2013 1:46:56 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/24/2013 2:56:40 PM
RE: .net development Posted by David Mustakim @ 12/24/2013 3:11:16 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 3:12:23 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/25/2013 6:41:32 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Glen Villar @ 12/30/2013 12:00:41 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/30/2013 5:44:23 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 10:32:44 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 11:35:08 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 1:24:09 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 5:45:18 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 6:55:49 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/29/2013 8:43:34 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/29/2013 5:28:48 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/30/2013 1:43:34 PM