Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. file info. rss.
 From: Michel Levy
  Where is Michel Levy?
 
 France
 Michel Levy
 To: Dan Baker
  Where is Dan Baker?
 Effort of the Poconos
 Pennsylvania - United States
 Dan Baker
 Tags
Subject: RE: .net development
Thread ID: 393675 Message ID: 393928 # Views: 58 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: Databases, Tables and SQL Server
Date: Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:24:09 PM         
   


> Hey Michel, good to hear from you. Happy holidays.
>
> I took a look at the StrataFrame documentation and it's extremely easy to read and
> seems very solid.
>
> If someone follows your path, a couple questions:
>
> 1. Do you recommend getting comfortable with .Net first or learning Strataframe
> and .Net togehte?
>
> 2. Does it matter which year's Visual Studio version you buy to get started?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan B.
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > My way was VB.net and StrataFrame, with SQL Server.
> >
> > All business code is either in SQL Server, either in StrataFrame business objects ; I can reuse it in all apps, desktop or web, no matter.
> >
> > Among all the 3rd-party data binding addons, I found Strata was the most simple to use, coming from the VFP world (and BTW it was the fastest, and the cleanest for a SQL developper)
> >
> >
> > Michel L

--
Hi Dan,

1) Learning StrataFrame is a very cool and comfortable way to learn .net (Strata is the addon that gave me the pleasure of .net developpment, before Strata it was a real pain for me).

2) Go with the year's Visual Studio you use today, Strata is compatible with all versions since 2005. Be aware that Strata is not comptaible with express edition

Michel L

ENTIRE THREAD

.net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/21/2013 10:36:52 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Paul Hemans @ 12/21/2013 9:06:52 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/23/2013 9:35:34 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Stefan Wuebbe @ 12/23/2013 10:26:41 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:50:04 AM
RE: .net development Posted by naveed ahmad @ 12/23/2013 2:27:02 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:47:55 AM
RE: .net development Posted by naveed ahmad @ 12/24/2013 7:13:04 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Victor Espina @ 12/23/2013 2:40:26 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:49:06 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Tore Bleken @ 12/23/2013 2:52:38 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:51:10 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/23/2013 5:26:02 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:55:51 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 12:16:20 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 1:15:48 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/24/2013 1:41:31 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 3:02:13 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 2:28:30 AM
RE: .net development Posted by David Mustakim @ 12/24/2013 1:46:56 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/24/2013 2:56:40 PM
RE: .net development Posted by David Mustakim @ 12/24/2013 3:11:16 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 3:12:23 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/25/2013 6:41:32 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Glen Villar @ 12/30/2013 12:00:41 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/30/2013 5:44:23 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 10:32:44 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 11:35:08 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 1:24:09 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 5:45:18 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 6:55:49 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/29/2013 8:43:34 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/29/2013 5:28:48 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/30/2013 1:43:34 PM