Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. file info. rss.
 From: Michel Levy
  Where is Michel Levy?
 
 France
 Michel Levy
 To: Dan Baker
  Where is Dan Baker?
 Effort of the Poconos
 Pennsylvania - United States
 Dan Baker
 Tags
Subject: RE: .net development
Thread ID: 393675 Message ID: 393939 # Views: 56 # Ratings: 1
Version: Not Applicable Category: Databases, Tables and SQL Server
Date: Thursday, December 26, 2013 6:55:49 PM         
   


> Comfortable way to learn?   I like that.
>
> Thanks Michel...
>
> > --
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > 1) Learning StrataFrame is a very cool and comfortable way to learn .net (Strata is the addon that gave me the pleasure of .net developpment, before Strata it was a real pain for me).
> >
> > 2) Go with the year's Visual Studio you use today, Strata is compatible with all versions since 2005. Be aware that Strata is not comptaible with express edition
> >
> > Michel L

--
yes, comfortable way to learn .net:
Strata is datacentric, and all the Strata development team comes from VFP (they switched to .net being on VFP7, for their own line of software).

BTW, the StrataFrame core classes are all datacentric. Their visual controls are data binded on their non visual data classes, à la FoxPro, and it is far more comfortable to only learn how to choose and use .net classes logic. You don't need to struggle against a new language.

I can say that I learned .net with Strata, using Strata (and using Strata is as using VFP and SQL)

I wrote a first app after 3 weeks (simple app, but built on 3 layers, with 50~60 forms and ~20 reports). After 6 or 8 monthes, I was more productive in .net than in VFP



Michel L

ENTIRE THREAD

.net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/21/2013 10:36:52 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Paul Hemans @ 12/21/2013 9:06:52 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/23/2013 9:35:34 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Stefan Wuebbe @ 12/23/2013 10:26:41 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:50:04 AM
RE: .net development Posted by naveed ahmad @ 12/23/2013 2:27:02 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:47:55 AM
RE: .net development Posted by naveed ahmad @ 12/24/2013 7:13:04 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Victor Espina @ 12/23/2013 2:40:26 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:49:06 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Tore Bleken @ 12/23/2013 2:52:38 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:51:10 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/23/2013 5:26:02 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 6:55:51 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 12:16:20 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/24/2013 1:15:48 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/24/2013 1:41:31 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 3:02:13 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 2:28:30 AM
RE: .net development Posted by David Mustakim @ 12/24/2013 1:46:56 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/24/2013 2:56:40 PM
RE: .net development Posted by David Mustakim @ 12/24/2013 3:11:16 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Cetin Basoz @ 12/24/2013 3:12:23 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/25/2013 6:41:32 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Glen Villar @ 12/30/2013 12:00:41 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Binod Binani @ 12/30/2013 5:44:23 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 10:32:44 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 11:35:08 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 1:24:09 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Dan Baker @ 12/26/2013 5:45:18 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/26/2013 6:55:49 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/29/2013 8:43:34 AM
RE: .net development Posted by Michel Levy @ 12/29/2013 5:28:48 PM
RE: .net development Posted by Benny Thomas @ 12/30/2013 1:43:34 PM