Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. file info. rss.
 From: Mike Yearwood
  Where is Mike Yearwood?
 Toronto
 Canada
 Mike Yearwood
 To: claude fox
  Where is claude fox?
 Centreville
 Virginia - United States
 claude fox
 Tags
Subject: RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled
Thread ID: 268278 Message ID: 268621 # Views: 39 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: Web Applications
Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 3:57:25 PM         
   


> > I'm often surprised by such debates. Everyone seems to insist on having 15 ways to do everything, so obviously we must have at least BOTH. :) (scripting and compiled). :)
>
> They all seem to end up being both scripted and compiled apparently. Even PHP with Zend is compiled. Of course with VFP web apps and ActiveVFP you could just include the fxps or put the new code in the activevfp.dll and compile it. However, for simplicity the dfault will be to just have .prgs and have them compiled on the fly via ExecScript.
>
> Developing web applications with WordPress and PHP has been an inspiration to me in it's simplicity and power!

I'm using DotNetNuke - remotely hosted - because then I get expert network support as well as included SQL Server 2005. I also use OpenWebStudio with it. OpenWebStudio makes everything into "scripts" much like my snippet factory article but taken to such an extreme that it becomes remarkably useful.

>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike Yearwood
> > Microsoft MVP Visual FoxPro 2008, 2009
> > We have enough youth. We need a fountain of smart!
> > There may be many ways to skin a cat, but there are very few right ways to do it.
>
>
>
> ActiveVFP - http://activevfp.codeplex.com - Open Source VFP web development
> MtmyVFP - http://mtmyvfp.codeplex.com - Easily multi-thread VFP desktop code!



Mike Yearwood
Microsoft MVP Visual FoxPro 2008, 2009
We have enough youth. We need a fountain of smart!
There may be many ways to skin a cat, but there are very few right ways to do it.

ENTIRE THREAD

Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/9/2010 5:28:02 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/9/2010 8:31:58 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/9/2010 8:36:50 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/13/2010 3:57:25 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/13/2010 4:44:18 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/13/2010 5:55:00 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/13/2010 7:06:18 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/13/2010 7:38:18 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Dan Baker @ 7/14/2010 9:38:35 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/14/2010 10:17:53 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Dan Baker @ 7/14/2010 11:26:52 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Neeraj Charne @ 7/15/2010 8:21:12 AM