Welcome To The Home Of The Visual FoxPro Experts  
home. signup. forum. archives. search. google. articles. downloads. faq. members. weblogs. file info. rss.
 From: Mike Yearwood
  Where is Mike Yearwood?
 Toronto
 Canada
 Mike Yearwood
 To: claude fox
  Where is claude fox?
 Centreville
 Virginia - United States
 claude fox
 Tags
Subject: RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled
Thread ID: 268278 Message ID: 268644 # Views: 35 # Ratings: 0
Version: Not Applicable Category: Web Applications
Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:55:00 PM         
   


> The thing with WordPress is there so many "themes" available and plugins, many of them free. I can put together a website with any professional look I like by using one the million themes available. DNN is similar. What would be really cool is if we could take any WordPress theme and auto-convert it to work with ActiveVFP - the .css would remain the same as would the layout. Just the code would change from php to vfp...

Or convert wordpress themes to DNN. :)

>
> >
> > I'm using DotNetNuke - remotely hosted - because then I get expert network support as well as included SQL Server 2005. I also use OpenWebStudio with it. OpenWebStudio makes everything into "scripts" much like my snippet factory article but taken to such an extreme that it becomes remarkably useful.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike Yearwood
> > Microsoft MVP Visual FoxPro 2008, 2009
> > We have enough youth. We need a fountain of smart!
> > There may be many ways to skin a cat, but there are very few right ways to do it.
>
>
>
> ActiveVFP - http://activevfp.codeplex.com - Open Source VFP web development
> MtmyVFP - http://mtmyvfp.codeplex.com - Easily multi-thread VFP desktop code!



Mike Yearwood
Microsoft MVP Visual FoxPro 2008, 2009
We have enough youth. We need a fountain of smart!
There may be many ways to skin a cat, but there are very few right ways to do it.

ENTIRE THREAD

Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/9/2010 5:28:02 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/9/2010 8:31:58 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/9/2010 8:36:50 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/13/2010 3:57:25 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/13/2010 4:44:18 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/13/2010 5:55:00 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/13/2010 7:06:18 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Mike Yearwood @ 7/13/2010 7:38:18 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Dan Baker @ 7/14/2010 9:38:35 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by claude fox @ 7/14/2010 10:17:53 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Dan Baker @ 7/14/2010 11:26:52 PM
RE: Scripting vs. traditional compiled Posted by Neeraj Charne @ 7/15/2010 8:21:12 AM